Sample data loaded — Steps 5 & 6 are populated with synthetic values so you can see how the analysis looks.
Response
Unit
Goal
Target
2Bioprocess Preset
2Factors (2-8 supported)
Name
Low (-1)
High (+1)
Unit
3Design Type
Center Points
Randomize
4Run trials
3Design Summary
3Visual Design Matrix
High (+1) Low (−1) Center (0) Axial (+α) Axial (−α)
3Factor Levels Across Runs
3Design Matrix Heatmap
4Run Table
Quick fill:
Paste N values (one per line, in run order). Excel/CSV column copy-paste works.
5Analyze Interactions
Response:
How to read this panel: Each bar in the Pareto chart shows how strongly that factor (or interaction) affects your response. Bars to the right of the dashed red line are statistically significant (p<0.05) — those are the levers worth tuning. Bar colours indicate term type: teal = main effect, blue = 2-factor interaction, purple = quadratic curvature. The Effects Table below gives precise numbers and the R² tells you how well the model fits (closer to 100% = better).
Residuals vs Fitted — random cloud = good; pattern = misfit
Normal Q-Q Plot — points on the line = normally distributed residuals
6Identify Optimum
How to read this panel:
Best Measured Run — the actual run from your data with the best score. Use these settings to reproduce a result you've already seen.
Predicted Optimum — where the fitted model says the true peak is. This may not be one of your runs — the model interpolates between data points. To validate, run 2–3 confirmation experiments at the predicted settings.
Multi-Response Best Compromise — when you have multiple responses with different goals (e.g. maximise titre AND minimise HCP), this finds the single set of factor values that scores well on all of them simultaneously (Derringer-Suich desirability).
Response Surface (Contour)
Response:X:Y:
Other factors held at the predicted optimum. Star marks the optimum.