Cell-Specific Perfusion Rate (CSPR) Calculator

Calculate the perfusion rate needed to sustain your target cell density. Select an organism preset or enter custom CSPR values.

Organism Preset
Target VCD (×10⁶ cells/mL) ?
Bioreactor Volume (L)
CSPR (pL/cell/day) ?
Results
Bleed Rate Calculator

Calculate the bleed rate needed to maintain steady-state cell density. At steady state: growth rate = bleed rate + death rate.

Target VCD (×10⁶ cells/mL)
Growth Rate μ (1/day) ?
Death Rate (1/day) ?
Retention Efficiency (%) ?
Bioreactor Volume (L)
Perfusion Rate (L/day) ?
Results
Steady-State VCD Predictor

Simulate VCD trajectory over time using a simple ODE model (Euler method). Perfusion and bleed start at a user-defined time point.

Initial VCD (×10⁶ cells/mL)
Growth Rate μ (1/day)
Death Rate (1/day)
Target VCD (×10⁶ cells/mL)
Perfusion Start Day ?
Simulation Days
Bioreactor Volume (L)
Results
Harvest & Productivity Calculator

Estimate daily and cumulative product output based on specific productivity (qP), cell density, and harvest strategy.

Specific Productivity qP (pg/cell/day) ?
Steady-State VCD (×10⁶ cells/mL)
Bioreactor Volume (L)
Run Duration (days)
Perfusion Rate (L/day)
Product Recovery (%) ?
Results
Batch vs Fed-Batch vs Perfusion Comparison

Compare the three major culture modes for the same bioreactor volume. Estimates include turnaround time for annual productivity calculations.

Bioreactor Volume (L)
qP (pg/cell/day)
Turnaround Time (days) ?
Product Recovery (%)
Media Consumption & Cost Analysis

Compare media consumption and cost per gram of product across culture modes.

Bioreactor Volume (L)
Media Cost ($/L)
Perfusion VVD (volumes/day) ?
qP (pg/cell/day)
Media Usage & Cost per Mode
Cell Retention Device Comparison

Reference table of common cell retention devices used in perfusion bioreactors, with typical operating parameters, pros, and cons.

Device Retention Max VCD Pros Cons Scalability
ATF (Alternating Tangential Flow) >99% 200×10⁶ Excellent retention, proven at scale, low shear, supports very high VCD, widely adopted in industry Membrane fouling over time, diaphragm pump maintenance, higher capital cost, membrane replacement Excellent
TFF (Tangential Flow Filtration) 95-99% 100×10⁶ Continuous operation, good product clearance, well-understood technology Fouling risk, higher shear than ATF, requires pump control, cell damage at high densities Good
Acoustic Settler 90-95% 40×10⁶ Very gentle (no membrane contact), no fouling, no moving parts, low maintenance Lower retention efficiency, limited VCD capacity, scale-up challenges, heat generation Moderate
Gravity Settler 80-90% 20×10⁶ Simplest design, no moving parts, no membranes, lowest cost, easy to implement Low retention efficiency, low max VCD, large footprint, temperature sensitivity, cell settling variability Limited
Spin Filter (Internal) 90-95% 50×10⁶ Internal to bioreactor, compact, continuous operation, no external loop Fouling/clogging, difficult to clean/replace in situ, shear at filter surface, limited scale-up Moderate

Related Articles

Batch vs Continuous Cost
Economic comparison of manufacturing modes